| 摘要: |
| 伴随着全球经济数字化转型，国家间数字经贸往来大幅增多，不同国家在跨境数据流动、人工智能治理、跨国平台监管等方面的政策法规差异成为制约发展的巨大障碍。这促使各国加强多边和区域层面对数字议题的讨论，深化国家间政策法规协调，使得以发展为导向的全球数字治理体系加速形成和发展。然而，乌克兰危机升级以来出现了大量用于对抗的数字化元素，如针对关键基础设施的网络攻击、社交媒体舆情引导与管控、两用数字技术使用、私营跨国数字企业卷入国家冲突等。各国不得不重新审视数字全球化发展与合作，更多地将注意力从发展转向安全，对全球数字治理发展走向产生了巨大影响。主要国家不仅加强了国内数字监管治理和国际网络安全合作，而且积极与盟友合作争夺全球数字经贸治理主导权，使得全球数字治理底色更保守、取向更强调安全、主导权竞争更激烈、多边解决方案更难达成。面对形势变化，中国应通过扩大数字领域开放、完善中国数字治理方案、建立多层次数字朋友圈和充分融入多边机制数字治理谈判等方式深化对全球数字治理的影响。 |
| 关键词: 乌克兰危机 数字治理 数字政策 数字技术 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目“数字经济时代兼顾个人信息保护和数据要素市场培育的治理机制设计”(项目编号:21CJL010)；对外经济贸易大学区域国别研究联合专项课题(项目编号:LHZX202210)。 |
|
| Unexpected Challenge: Ukraine’s Crisis Escalation Pushes Global Digital Governance to Accelerate Shift |
| YUE Yunsong,XUE Xinlong |
|
| Abstract: |
| With the Digital transformation of the global economy, digital economic and trade exchanges between countries have increased significantly. The differences in policies and regulations of different countries in cross-border data flow, AI governance, transnational platform supervision and other aspects have become a huge obstacle to development. This has prompted countries to strengthen discussions on digital issues at the multilateral and regional levels, deepen coordination of policies and regulations between countries, and promote the accelerated formation and development of a global digital governance system oriented towards development. However, during the Ukraine’s Crisis escalation, a large number of digital elements were used for confrontation, such as network attacks against key infrastructure, social media public opinion control, the use of dual-use digital technology, and the involvement of private transnational digital enterprises in national conflicts. Countries have begun to re-examine the development and cooperation of digital globalization, shifting their attention from development to security, which has greatly affected the development direction of global digital governance. Major countries have not only strengthened domestic digital regulatory governance and international cybersecurity cooperation, but also actively cooperated with allies to compete for the dominant position in global digital economic and trade governance, making the global digital governance background more conservative, the orientation more focused on security, the competition for dominant power more intense, and multilateral solutions more difficult to achieve. Faced with changes in the situation, China should deepen its impact on global digital governance by expanding the opening up of the digital field, improving China’s digital governance plan, establishing multi-level digital circles of friends, and fully integrating into multilateral mechanisms for digital governance negotiations. |
| Key words: Ukraine’s Crisis digital governance digital policy digital technology |
